|
Quid pro quo (Latin for "something for something" Merriam-Webster, the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (Fourth Edition), and the New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy (Third Edition)[1] all so define the Latin expression.) indicates a more-or-less equal exchange or substitution of goods or services.
English speakers often use the term to mean "a favor for a favor" and the phrases "what for what", "give and take", "tit for tat (this for that)" have similar meanings.
Contents |
In legal usage, quid pro quo indicates that an item or a service has been traded in return for something of value, usually when the propriety or equity of the transaction is in question. For example, under the common law (except in Scotland), a binding contract must involve consideration: that is, the exchange of something of value for something else of economic value. If the exchange appears excessively one sided, courts in some jurisdictions may question whether a quid pro quo did not actually exist and the contract may be voidable.[citation needed]
Another set of examples arises when an exchange is prohibited by public policy. Where prostitution is illegal, it remains common and lawful to use gifts, expensive meals and so on, as a means of attracting a sexual partner. The distinction is whether sexual favors are directly conditional on receiving gifts and vice-versa. In the absence of such a quid pro quo, there is no prostitution. Similarly, political donors are legally entitled to support candidates that hold positions with which the donors agree, or which will benefit the donors. Such conduct becomes bribery only when there is an identifiable exchange between the contribution and official acts, previous or subsequent, and the term quid pro quo denotes such an exchange. The term may also be used to describe blackmail, where a person offers to refrain from some harmful conduct in return for valuable consideration.
The term is also widely used to denote a type of sexual harassment in two variations, one of which answers to bribery and the other to blackmail. In the former case, unwarranted advancement is offered in return for sexual favors. In the second, deserved advancement, or simple continuation in service, is conditional on sexual receptivity. Since it is not unlawful per se for a boss to ask a subordinate for sex, nor vice-versa, it is the quid pro quo that makes the situation repugnant to the law.
Quid pro quo may less commonly refer to something (originally a medicine) given or used in place of another.
Quid pro quo may sometimes be used to define a misunderstanding or blunder made by the substituting of one thing for another, particularly in the context of the transcribing of a text."Blunder made by using or putting one thing for another (now rare)" – Concise Oxford Dictionary, 4th edition, 1950.
Quid pro quo may sometimes be described as the idiom,"You scratch my back and I\'ll scratch yours". In legislative contexts, it may take the form of vote trading.
Quid pro quo is often used as a term in England to mean \'What\'s in it for me?\'
The phrase qui pro quo, or quiproquo (from medieval Latin: literally qui instead of quo) is common in Romance languages such as Italian, Portuguese, Spanish and French, where it means a misunderstanding.Qui pro quo used to refer to a copying mistake made by a scribe, qui being the nominative case and quo the ablative case of the same personal pronoun.
In those languages, the phrase corresponding to the usage of quid pro quo in English is do ut des (Latin for "I give, so that you might give").Further information may be found in the AWADmail Issue 49
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia